U.S.S. Tuna (1912): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Construction and Performance== | ==Construction and Performance== | ||
For some reason, G-2 and [[U.S.S. Seal ( | For some reason, G-2 and [[U.S.S. Seal (1911)|G-1]] underwent extensive standardization trials off Provincetown in 1915 – well after their commissioning. G-2 was found especially wanting in important areas:{{USNavalEstimatesVolII1916|pp. 1547, 1552}} | ||
* failed to meet speeds specified in contract. It was thought that the propellers might be responsible | * failed to meet speeds specified in contract. It was thought that the propellers might be responsible | ||
* fuel gauges are not satisfactory, as they serve multiple tanks | * fuel gauges are not satisfactory, as they serve multiple tanks |
Revision as of 15:02, 30 December 2014
U.S.S. Tuna (1912) | |
---|---|
Hull Number: | SS-27 |
Builder: | Lake Torpedo Boat[1] |
Ordered: | Act of May, 1908[2] |
Laid down: | 20 Oct, 1909 |
Launched: | 10 Jan, 1912[3] |
Commissioned: | 1 Dec, 1913 |
Decommissioned: | 2 Apr, 1919 |
Stricken: | 11 Sep, 1919 |
Foundered: | 30 Jul, 1919 |
Fate: | at her mooring |
U.S.S. G-2, laid down as U.S.S. Tuna and renamed before being launched, was one of four Seal (or "G") class submarines completed for the U.S. Navy.
She commissioned on 1 December, 1913 under the command of Lieutenant, junior grade Ralph C. Needham.
Construction and Performance
For some reason, G-2 and G-1 underwent extensive standardization trials off Provincetown in 1915 – well after their commissioning. G-2 was found especially wanting in important areas:[4]
- failed to meet speeds specified in contract. It was thought that the propellers might be responsible
- fuel gauges are not satisfactory, as they serve multiple tanks
- depth-keeping was poor, and variations exceeded 3 foot limit in contract. It was surmised that better depth gauges (present ones were "sluggish" small-diameter Bourbon ones) might address this.
- only 12 knots were obtained on four-hour run when 14.5 knots were required. At 12 knots, endurance was calculated at 83.7 hours. Endurance at 3.95 knots was calculated at 15 hours 15 minutes
- a diving rudder "carried away" during a high speed submerged run, and speeds of 10.5 knots required were not met
- a requirement to run 3 hours at 8.5 knots submerged was badly missed at (a calculated) 1 hour 43 minutes
- the sub could not reverse her screws in the 10 seconds required
Torpedo firing and deep submergence tests to 200 feet were successful and tactical diameter acceptable. Unlike G-1, G-2's periscopes seemed to work well. Metacentric heights were acceptable at 14.88 inches surfaced, 16.2 inches submerged.
The commanding officer, Ralph C. Needham requested a considerable number of changes, including:[5]
- add metal draft marks to replace the quickly-effaced painted ones
- move the electric stove, as it interferes with the starboard torpedo tube during reloading operations
- repair hand pumps – a handle broke during the trial
- fix leaky superstructure
- add a permanent pelorus on the bridge for the new gyrocompass repeater
- make adjustments in conduit routing to permit freer use of the aft periscope
- add a telephone to the rescue marker buoy
- add an electric telegraph at bridge to command forward dive planes and engines and motors.
Service
Torpedoes
- two tubes forward, with storage in the boat for two torpedoes
- two tubes fixed in the superstructure, with storage for an an additional two torpedoes
G-2 only had internal storage for two torpedoes beyond those in the two forward tubes. Corrosion made storage in the tubes acceptable only in wartime. The two tubes in the superstructure were deemed "unfit for war purposes due to their inaccessibility for loading. The torpedo storage space in the superstructure is also useless." This was because to load these tubes, one had to flood the boat down to float the torpedoes out of storage and into the mouth of the tubes, with men working overboard! The wet torpedoes, once loaded, could not be serviced and had to be fired promptly. The overall design was so poor that the board suggested that the boat should be reclassified as having two tubes, rather than four.[6]
Captains
- Lieutenant (Junior Grade) Ralph C. Needham, 1 December, 1913[7]
See Also
Footnotes
- ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 128.
- ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 128.
- ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 128.
- ↑ Estimates Submitted to the Secretary of the Navy, Volume II, 1916. pp. 1547, 1552.
- ↑ Estimates Submitted to the Secretary of the Navy, Volume II, 1916. pp. 1549-51.
- ↑ Estimates Submitted to the Secretary of the Navy, Volume II, 1916. pp. 1545-46.
- ↑ Register of Officers, 1914. p. 40.
Bibliography
Seal Class Submarine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seal | Thrasher | Tuna | Turbot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<– | Narwhal Class | Submarines (US) | Skipjack Class | –> |